English term
conceivable
He observes that it “references a conflict without any conceivable mobilized army.”
Can anyone help me understand the phrase in the quotation marks, especially the word "conceivable"?
Thank you in advance
4 +9 | (scarcely) imaginable | Yvonne Gallagher |
Context | philgoddard |
Non-PRO (2): Edith Kelly, acetran
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
(scarcely) imaginable
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 mins (2017-04-18 10:08:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
it would be good to have the rest of the sentence and what goes before and after inorder to give the best interpretation but
"a conflict without any conceivable mobilized army" possibly means
a conflict with no army mobilized
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs (2017-04-18 13:04:27 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Thanks to Phil for posting the context.
"...it references a conflict without any conceivable mobilized army." could be rewritten as:
this is or refers to a conflict (of class warfare) where it would be hard to imagine (OR it's highly unlikely that) an "army" or credible opposition can be organised
agree |
philgoddard
: "References" appears to mean "is". "It" is class war.
2 hrs
|
Many thanks for posting context!
|
|
agree |
Tony M
: Or, now we know, "no possibility of any army's being mobilized"
2 hrs
|
Thanks.Yes, just added note
|
|
agree |
Tina Vonhof (X)
4 hrs
|
Thanks:-)
|
|
agree |
Yasutomo Kanazawa
5 hrs
|
Thanks:-)
|
|
agree |
Edith Kelly
5 hrs
|
Thanks:-)
|
|
agree |
Suncana Kursan
6 hrs
|
Thanks:-)
|
|
agree |
AllegroTrans
11 hrs
|
Thanks:-)
|
|
agree |
David Hollywood
16 hrs
|
Thanks:-)
|
|
agree |
lazarustke
1 day 14 hrs
|
Thanks:-)
|
Reference comments
Context
agree |
Tony M
: Ah yes, now THAT does make sense!
10 mins
|
agree |
Jack Doughty
45 mins
|
agree |
AllegroTrans
: This makes sense but pity asker has not responded to request for context
8 hrs
|
agree |
acetran
1 day 1 hr
|
Discussion
Usually, when something is said to be 'not conceivable' or 'inconceivable', it means it is impossible for it to happen / exist.
That seems to be the negative sense here with 'without any' — although it is then slightly difficult to see just what the writer meant by it; obviously, it is difficult to have a war if you don't have armed forces to fight it! But how does that fit with the rest of your context surrounding this quote?